Magazine for women

Online magazine for women

Home / Pregnancy / Eco – pros and cons

Eco – pros and cons

/
772 Views

Eco – pros and cons; When extracorporeal fertilization is not the only output; Alternatives to Eco, modern and efficient infertility treatment options. What will help except eco.

Eco - pros and cons

Being a new breakthrough in the field of medicine, allowing from from now on to have a child even those couples that nature refused this happiness, extracorporeal fertilization over several decades firmly entered our life, becoming one of the most pressing and understandable procedures.

But it is already necessary to eco in the treatment of infertility, or there are some alternatives to him?

Let’s try to figure it out in this matter.

Extracorporeal fertilization – the most effective method of treating infertility

Eco - pros and cons

In the huge meaning of extracorporeal fertilization in the field of treatment of infertility, nobody doubts. Eco treats many forms of female and male infertility, Being sometimes the only option for spouses to have healthy children.

Since 1978, when this method was applied in medical practice for the first time, in one of the clinics of England, Eco has passed a huge path of development, and at present these methods have been worked out perfectly, guaranteeing a very high success percentage with each procedure, with any diagnosis of spouses.

The essence of the ECO procedure It is to arrange «Meeting» egg and spermatozoid outside the body of a woman, and then Spring in its uterus already fertilized and developing embryo. As a rule, for such a procedure, each woman grows several eggs and fertilize them.

The strongest embryos and sit in the uterus – very often after Eco, a woman gives birth to twins, and if there is a threat to the unbearable of these children, then at wishes they can remove «superfluous» Embryos already from the uterus – however, it sometimes threatens complications for future pregnancy and the death of the embryos remaining in the uterus.

Eco successfully about 35% of the procedures is a very high result, if we take into account the greater complexity of the methods performed.

Eco – all for and against

A few years earlier, the process of extracorporeal fertilization was little accessible, especially Russian depths. In addition, this procedure was and remains paid, and this is very considerable money.

In addition to the fee for the procedure itself, it is necessary to take into account the high cost Analyzes in front of eco. Currently, the majority of infertile couples of childbearing age are allocated state quotas for the ECO procedure, This method of infertility treatment is available to everyone, Who needs in it.

Of course, those married couples that have hope to become parents only in the event of Eco, hotly support this method of treating infertility. The same opinions are adhered to doctors – gynecologists, as well as genetics – in the process of Eco all Biological material is very thorough medical research, and excludes the birth of kids with genetic deviations, hereditary diseases or other pathology.

Pregnancy and childbirth of a woman who became pregnant as a result of the Eco procedure, do not differ at all from pregnancy a woman who got pregnant naturally.

Eco - pros and cons

However, at the progressive direction of medicine – extracorporeal fertilization – there is opponents. Mostly, against eco procedures perform Religious representatives of different denominations, Including Orthodox Activists. They consider this way to conceive barbaric, unnatural.

In addition, as a result of the cultivation of embryos, their part dies – and this is unacceptable, in the view of representatives of the Church, because it is the murder of already conceived children.

Whatever it was, and Truth is always somewhere in the middle. To date Eco is necessary for the treatment of complex types of infertility. Medical science develops, and now in the process of Eco doctors can only use one egg, growing only one-only embryo, which does not contradict ethical principles, and does not insult the feelings of enemy eco.

Currently, a special method is widely developed – «Modified natural cycle» (MTC), which lies in the medical (hormonal) support for the growth of one follicle with small doses of the follicularity hormone, and then maintaining its stability and preventing premature ovulation Another group of hormones – GNVG antagonists.

It is a more complex technique, but she strongly justifies himself in practice.

When Eco is not the only way?

Are there an alternative to extracorporeural fertilization?

In some cases, the usual ECO procedure cannot bring a pair of the desired result in the form of long-awaited pregnancy. This is mostly in pairs where women have both uterine pipes, or several attempts of Eco did not bring the desired result.

What is the same alternative to extracorporeural fertilization in this case, and what chances of a couple get a long-awaited child?

Consider The most discussed and well-known options.

Sender sexual partner

It is no secret that sometimes a man and a woman fit well to each other spiritually and physically, but their sex cells may be Antagonists of each other, not allowing a child. In such cases, the people will make one advice – to change the sexual partner, to conceive a child from another man. Default about the moral side of this «Alternatives», Note only that the change of sexual partner may not lead to the desired result, but to the problems in the family – very often.

Oval donation.
If a woman has for one way or another, it is impossible to take an egg for the ECO procedure, then this procedure is performed using donor eggs, Taking, for example, near relatives – sisters, moms, daughters, or silent material.

Otherwise, the fertilization procedure with a donor egg cell does not differ from the standard ECO procedure – just appear in it Additional stages for taking eggs at the donor.

Intrauterine insemination sperm

This method of treating infertility is as close as possible to the natural fertilization, with the difference only in the fact that there are not embryos grown outside of its organism in the woman’s uterus, but Purified and specially prepared cum Muga.

Exactly the same procedure perform a lonely woman wishing to have a child, introducing her donor sperm. As a rule, the method applies if a woman has a natural ovulation and confirmation in Patency of uterine pipes.

The offensive of a woman of pregnancy as a result of the method of intrauterine insemination occurs in about 12% of cases.

Gift method (Intractor Transfer Games)

Eco - pros and cons

This is a newer than ECO, but has already been proven – a more efficient method of extracorporeal fertilization, which serves as an excellent alternative that has the right to further develop and use in medicine.

With this method sexual gates of partners, namely – eggs and spermatozoa, are not introduced into the uterine cavity, and in the uterine pipes women. Fertilization, which occurs as a result of this process, is as close as possible to the natural.

Moreover, this method has certain advantages over the classic Eco option, because the uterus, while the fertilized egg is moving towards it in the uterine pipes, has the ability Get ready for the adoption of the embryo, gain the ability of best implantation it in its own wall.

This method is most effective For women aged – after 40 years, having a secondary infertility.

ZIFT method (intractor transportation of the zygota)
The method of intratubar transportation of the zygot is known from the same time as the Gift method. In essence, Zyft is the transfer of the eggs in the earliest stages of division already fertilized outside the body, not in the uterine cavity, and in the fallopian tubes.

This method is also close to natural fertilization, it allows the uterus fully prepared for the upcoming pregnancy and take a fertilized egg to your wall.

Methods Zyft and Gift will suit only those women who preserve the uterine pipes, or at least one uterine tube that has kept its functionality. This method is more effective For young women with secondary infertility.

The frequency of pregnancy as a result of the last two alternative methods of Eco – Zyft and Gift – more often than with the usual ECO procedure.

These methods are good for the fact that when they are used, an ectopic pregnancy is almost completely excluded.

Accurate measurement of the body temperature of a woman to determine the moment of ovulation

Eco - pros and cons

In recent years, the method of accurate definition of ovulation moments in a woman has been known, and therefore the best moment for conceiving a child naturally. This method was developed by the New Zealand Scientist-Chemist Shersus Hashir. This new method is based on one technical invention – Special electronic device, which is in the body of a woman and gives signals about changing its body temperature even half a degree.

As is known, the moment of ovulation is accompanied by some increase in the temperature of the body of a woman, and this can definitely say spouses wishing to have children when it is necessary to perform sexual intercourse for conception. The device for measuring temperature in the body of a woman is inexpensive – about 500 pounds, it is significantly cheaper than the usual Eco procedure.

Couples who want to have a child should be on orienting the signal that gives the device in case of ovulation.

This method guarantees a high percentage of pregnancy in pairs, where a woman has irregular cycles, or an inhibular cycles – but, unfortunately, it has not yet been widespread, is currently at the study stage and is promising as Alternative to extracorporeal fertilization.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

It is main inner container footer text